Lowest scores
WashinForeskins
REGISTERED
What's the point of competing if the top score has 125 moves in 20 seconds.
WashinForeskins
REGISTERED
Comments
Who can believe these so-called "top score" ?? At about the same moment, many superfast magicians?
@Bury318 check out this thread, where a super fast magician explains how it’s done
https://forum.greenfelt.net/discussion/12558/computer-vs-human
I generally ignore any scores lower than a minute. Besides, what's the point of trying to do it the absolute fastest way possible? Where's the enjoyment of the unfolding of the game? Is it merely the thrill of being "first", whatever that means? I know for myself, I don't use super moves or short cuts. I like the slower pace, the slower unfolding of the cards, the slower more deliberate pace of strategy of an unaided game. It feels more real and less like a mad sprint without regard to smelling the roses, so to speak.
@AnniePanny, nice!!
@WashinForeskins, maybe if you stop washing it and concentrate on the game instead 🌝.
Agree, they are not playing, their computer is. This site really should break down the times between computer assisted and human play. Wont happen though. Too many want to see their names first despite how it really gets there.
?? Time warp ??